• Eur Spine J · Feb 2017

    Only walking matters-assessment following lumbar stenosis decompression.

    • S Budithi, Rohit Dhawan, Andrew Cattell, Birender Balain, and David Jaffray.
    • Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Oswestry, UK.
    • Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb 1; 26 (2): 481-487.

    PurposeMultiple outcome measures exist to evaluate the outcomes of spinal decompression surgery; however, these tend to be complex and are difficult to express to the patient pre-operatively to accurately guide their expectations. We present outcomes, in terms of walking distance measurement, of a prospective single surgeon series of 76 consecutive patients with spinal stenosis.Methods76 patients (mean age 68.8 years; 48-91 years) had decompression surgery using spinous process osteotomy. Accurate measurement of walking distance was used as an outcome measure, and factors that affect it were evaluated. Walking distance was measured pre-operatively, post-operatively and at 3 months follow-up using a measuring wheel. The minimum follow-up was 5 years.ResultsThe mean distances walked were 78.1, 419.9 and 1285 m, respectively. Pre-operative disc height (p = 0.023) and male gender (p = 0.039) predicted a significant improvement in walking distance, while age (p = 0.23), ASA grade (p = 0.39) and the number of levels operated on (p = 0.89) did not significantly affect the increase in walking distance. 12 patients experienced post-operative complications (15.8%), and at last clinical follow-up (6.3 years, 5.1-6.9 years) 27 patients (35.5%) had residual leg symptoms and 8 had undergone further revision procedures (10.5%).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that walking distance is an accurate and accessible method of determining surgical outcomes.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.