• P Leman.
• Accident and Emergency Department, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.
• Eur J Emerg Med. 2002 Jun 1; 9 (2): 141-7.

AbstractThis study assessed the validity of standard urinalysis, urinalysis for leucocyte esterase and nitrites, and urgent microscopy in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in 60 female patients with a triage diagnosis of UTI. There were 24 (40%) proven UTIs after culture. Simple urinalysis was sensitive for UTI (95.8%) but the positive predictive value was only 45.1%. The addition of leucocyte esterase and nitrite urinalysis testing did not improve the sensitivity, but if both of these were positive the positive predictive value improved to 100%. Urgent microscopy alone was sensitive (100%) but non-specific (38.9%). The specificity of the diagnosis improved to 94.4% for organism counts of >or=10/microl and to 88.9% for leucocyte counts of >or=50/microl. The negative predictive value of no detectable leucocytes on microscopy was 94.7%. Screening for UTI in the emergency department (ED) population is improved by the addition of leucocyte esterase and nitrite test. A positive urinalysis test for leucocytes and nitrites, or urinalysis positive at levels of >or=500 leucocytes or >or=5 g/l protein should confirm a clinical diagnosis of UTI. Urgent urine microscopy should be performed only if the above criteria are not met yet a minimum of one urinalysis result is positive.

22 keywords...

hide…