• Lancet · Oct 2016

    Developmental profile of ocular refraction in patients with congenital cataract: a prospective cohort study.

    • Zhenzhen Liu, Erping Long, Jingjing Chen, Zhuoling Lin, Duoru Lin, Xiaohang Wu, Qianzhong Cao, Xiaoyan Li, Dongni Wang, Lixia Luo, Bo Qu, Runzhong Liu, Xiaopin Liu, Haotian Lin, Weirong Chen, and Yizhi Liu.
    • State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
    • Lancet. 2016 Oct 1; 388 Suppl 1: S54.

    BackgroundRefractive status is crucial to visual function and can change throughout life. For patients with congenital cataract, the developmental profile of refraction is complicated owing to the potential influence of diverse clinical manifestations and various treatments, and has not yet been fully characterised.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with congenital cataract from the Childhood Cataract Program of the Chinese Ministry of Health (CCPMOH). Two experienced cataract surgeons (YL and WC) did cataract removal or intraocular lens (IOL) implantation at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. Patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, then every 3 months thereafter. Follow-up refraction assessments were conducted with objective retinoscopy and cycloplegia, and were performed by experienced independent optometrists. We compared refraction status (presented as spherical equivalent), and the rate of myopic shift between bilateral and unilateral congenital cataract with linear mixed model (LMM) analysis, then compared the range of myopic shift between bilateral and unilateral congenital cataract with multivariate linear regression Ethical approval was provided by the institutional review board of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Guangzhou, China). Parents of participating children provided written informed consent.FindingsBetween Jan 1, 2010, and Oct 31, 2013, we enrolled 1258 participants, all of whom underwent cataract removal and/or intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. By study completion on Oct 31, 2015, 1164 (93%) participants had attended at least one follow-up visit and had refraction status recorded (6585 follow-ups total). Median follow-up was 3 years (IQR 2·5-4·5 years). Spherical equivalent measurements decreased by 1·36 D (SD 0·06) per year between 0·5 years and 4 years of age in bilateral and unilateral congenital cataract aphakic patients. The spherical equivalent of unilateral aphakia was 0·67 D (SD 0·31) smaller than that of bilateral aphakia after correcting for age and sex (p=0·0325). Spherical equivalents in congenital cataract pseudophakia decreased by 0·28 D (SD 0·02) between 1·5 years and 18 years of age (p<0·0001). Spherical equivalents in unilateral pseudophakia did not differ from bilateral pseudophakia (p=0·2996). With the current strategy for IOL calculation, the spherical equivalent in congenital cataract pseudophakia reached emmetropia around 6 years of age, while the healthy eyes of unilateral congenital cataract reached emmetropia at 9-10 years. The rate of myopic shift peaked in both young childhood and early adolescence in all participants. The range of myopic shift in the unilaterally congenital cataract affected eyes was correlated with age at refraction measurement, cataract removal, and IOL implantation, as well as with sex.InterpretationFactors that dictate the range of myopic shift in unilateral congenital cataract seem to be different from those in bilateral congenital cataract, indicating differences in the aetiopathogenesis and refractive prognosis between bilateral and unilateral congenital cataract. Refraction data from patients with congenital cataract are of clinical significance to the guidelines for congenital cataract treatment, especially for IOL calculation concerning the laterality of congenital cataract.FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China (number 81300750), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China Grants (973 program, 2015CB964600), the Key Research Plan for the National Natural Science Foundation of China (number 91546101) and the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (number 2014A030306030).Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.