• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Feb 2017

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Bilateral sternal infusion of ropivacaine and length of stay in ICU after cardiac surgery with increased respiratory risk: A randomised controlled trial.

    • Vedat Eljezi, Etienne Imhoff, Daniel Bourdeaux, Bruno Pereira, Mehdi Farhat, Pierre Schoeffler, Kasra Azarnoush, and Christian Dualé.
    • From the CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Médecine Péri-Opératoire (VE, EI, PS), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Pharmacie Centrale, Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied (DB), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et des Innovations (BP), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle Cardiologie, Chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire (MF, KA), Univ Clermont1, Fac Médecine (PS, KA), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique (CD) and Inserm, CIC1405 and U1107 'Neuro-Dol', Clermont-Ferrand, France (CD).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Feb 1; 34 (2): 56-65.

    BackgroundThe continuous bilateral infusion of a local anaesthetic solution around the sternotomy wound (bilateral sternal) is an innovative technique for reducing pain after sternotomy.ObjectiveTo assess the effects of the technique on the need for intensive care in cardiac patients at increased risk of respiratory complications.DesignRandomised, observer-blind controlled trial.SettingSingle centre, French University Hospital.PatientsIn total, 120 adults scheduled for open-heart surgery, with one of the following conditions: age more than 75 years, BMI >30 kg m, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, active smoking habit.InterventionEither a bilateral sternal infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (3 ml h through each catheter; 'intervention' group), or standardised care only ('control' group). Analgesia was provided with paracetamol and self-administered intravenous morphine.Main Outcome MeasuresThe length of time to readiness for discharge from ICU, blindly assessed by a committee of experts.ResultsNo effect was found between groups for the primary outcome (P = 0.680, intention to treat); the median values were 42.4 and 37.7 h, respectively for the control and intervention groups (P = 0.873). Similar nonsignificant trends were noted for other postoperative delays. Significant effects favouring the intervention were noted for dynamic pain, patient satisfaction, occurrence of nausea and vomiting, occurrence of delirium or mental confusion and occurrence of pulmonary complications. In 12 patients, although no symptoms actually occurred, the total ropivacaine plasma level exceeded the lowest value for which neurological symptoms have been observed in healthy volunteers.ConclusionBecause of a small size effect, and despite significant analgesic effects, this strategy failed to reduce the time spent in ICU.Trial RegistrationEudraCT (N°: 2012-005225-69); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01828788).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.