• Heather A Heaton, David M Nestler, Derick D Jones, Rachelen S Varghese, Christine M Lohse, Eric S Williamson, and Annie T Sadosty.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
• J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar 1; 52 (3): 370-376.

BackgroundScribe use throughout health care is becoming more common. There is limited peer-reviewed literature supporting this emerging role in health care despite rapid uptake of the role.ObjectivesOur study assesses impact of scribes on relative value units (RVUs) in adult and pediatric emergency departments (EDs).MethodsA prospective cohort study was developed in a tertiary academic ED. Charts were coded by an external billing and coding company, then returned and mapped by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision diagnostic codes. After training by a staff member with significant experience in implementing scribe programs, scribes provided 1-to-1 support to a provider as staffing allowed. Comparisons were made between scribed and nonscribed visits.ResultsThere were 49,389 patient visits during the study period (39,926 adult [80.84%] and 9463 pediatric [19.16%] visits), of which 7865 (15.9%) were scribed. For adults, scribed visits produced 0.20 additional RVUs per patient (p < 0.001). Scribes generated additional RVUs in Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 2 (p < 0.001) and 3 (p < 0.001) patients. There were variable effects of scribes on RVUs by diagnostic codes. For pediatric patients, scribed encounters generated 0.08 fewer RVUs per patient (p = 0.007). ESI score had no effect on RVUs. The impact of scribes on pediatric diagnostic groupings was inconsistent.ConclusionsScribes had a positive impact on RVUs in adult but not pediatric patients. Among adults, scribes led to higher RVUs in ESI 2 and 3 but not 4 and 5 patients, perhaps suggesting a limitation to improve revenue capture on lower-acuity patients.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

37 keywords...

hide…