• Acta Anaesthesiol Belg · Jan 2015

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Evaluation of intubating conditions in children after sevoflurane induction using propofol or rocuronium bromide--a randomised, prospective, double blind study.

    • S Gera, J S Dali, K R Sharma, R Garg, and M Arya.
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2015 Jan 1; 66 (4): 25-30.

    BackgroundThe use of sevoflurane without muscle relaxant for tracheal intubation has been widely investigated in children. Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers have long duration of action and do not provide rapid return of spontaneous ventilation. Use of suc-cinylcholine has been found to be associated with various side-effects especially in children. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effect of propofol 1.5 mg/kg without muscle relaxant, on intubating conditions in children 2-8 yrs of age and we compare them with those achieved with rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, at moderate sevoflurane concentration.MethodsFifty children between 2-8 yrs, ASA I or II scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated to either Group P (propofol) or group R (rocuronium). After premedication with oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg 30 min before surgery, anaesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in oxygen. Intravenous fentanyl 1 µg/kg was administered after securing intravenous access and dial concentration of sevoflurane was reduced to 4%. At one minute with regards to time T₀, the patients received the drug which was either intravenous rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg or an equal volume of 0.9% saline (D) and at three minutes (two minutes after D₁), second drug (D₂) was given, which was either propofol 1.5 mg/kg or an equal volume of 0.9% saline according to the group allocated. At four minutes, laryngoscopy was done and intubation performed with appropriate sized uncuffed endotracheal tube. Incidence of acceptable and excellent intubating conditions, time to intubation and hemodynamic parameters were recorded.ResultsIncidence of acceptable or excellent intubating conditions was similar in both groups (p = 1.00). The difference in time to intubation was statistically not significant (25.03 ± 6.05s in Group P and 24.38 ?5.58s in Group R, p = 0.694), at similar end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane (3.2 ± 0.20% in Group P and 3.1 ± 0.20% in Group R, p = 0.12).ConclusionPropofol (1.5 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) produced similar intubating conditions in children induced with sevoflurane.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…