• Alex Mu, Philip Peng, and Anne Agur.
• From the *Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and †Department of Anatomy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
• Anesth. Analg. 2017 Mar 1; 124 (3): 966-971.

BackgroundTrochanteric bursa (TB) injection with local anesthetic and corticosteroid is a treatment for patients suffering from greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Both landmark (LM)-guided and ultrasound (US)-guided methods have been used, but their accuracies have not been determined. This study examined the accuracy of these injections with cadaveric dissection.MethodsTwenty-four hip specimens were randomized to receive TB injections with methylene blue under either LM-guided or US-guided approach. After dissection, the locations of the dye were classified into 3 categories: intrabursal, extrabursal, or combined intrabursal and extrabursal. The presence of dye in the intrabursal space with or without extrabursal leak was considered a successful injection. Accuracy was defined as the percentage of successful injection.ResultsThe accuracies of the LM-guided and US-guided injection were 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.35-0.90) and 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.62-1.00), respectively, with no significant difference.ConclusionsThis is the first cadaveric study examining the accuracy of both the US-guided and LM-guided techniques for TB injection. Future clinical studies are required to compare the outcomes of LM-guided and US-guided greater trochanteric pain syndrome injection.

26 keywords...

hide…