-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is less costly and morbid than open lobectomy: a retrospective multiinstitutional database analysis.
- Scott J Swanson, Bryan F Meyers, Candace L Gunnarsson, Matthew Moore, John A Howington, Michael A Maddaus, Robert J McKenna, and Daniel L Miller.
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. sjswanson@partners.org
- Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012 Apr 1; 93 (4): 1027-32.
BackgroundThe Premier Perspective Database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC) was used to compare hospital costs and perioperative outcomes for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy procedures in the United States.MethodsEligible patients underwent a lobectomy for cancer by a thoracic surgeon, by VATS or open thoracotomy and were captured in the database between third quarter of 2007 and through 2008. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for binary outcomes. Ordinary least-squares regressions were used to estimate continuous outcomes. All models were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.ResultsA total of 3,961 patients underwent a lobectomy by a thoracic surgeon by open (n = 2,907) or VATS (n = 1,054) approach. Hospital costs were higher for open versus VATS; $21,016 versus $20,316 (p = 0.027). Adjustment for surgeon experience with VATS over the 6 months prior to each operation showed a significant association between surgeon experience and cost. Average costs ranged from $22,050 for low volume surgeons to $18,133 for high volume surgeons. For open lobectomies, cost differences by surgeon experience were not significant and both levels were estimated at $21,000. Length of stay was 7.83 versus 6.15 days, for open versus VATS (p = 0.000). Surgery duration was shorter for open procedures at 3.75 versus 4.09 for VATS (p = 0.000). The risk of adverse events was significantly lower in the VATS group, odds ratio of 1.22 (p = 0.019).ConclusionsLobectomy performed by the VATS approach as compared with an open technique results in shorter length of stay, fewer adverse events, and less cost to the hospital. Economic impact is magnified as the surgeon's experience increases.Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.