• O Uleberg, T Kristiansen, K Pape, P R Romundstad, and P Klepstad.
• Department of Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Services, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Mar 1; 61 (3): 346-356.

BackgroundThe available information on trauma care in mixed rural-urban areas with scattered populations is limited. The aim of this study is to describe epidemiology, resource use, transfers and outcomes for trauma care within such an area, prior to implementation of a formal trauma system.MethodsA multicentre observational study including potential severely injured patients from June 2007 to May 2010. All patients received by trauma teams at seven acute care hospitals (ACH) and one major trauma centre (MTC) were included. Major trauma was defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15.ResultsA total of 2323 patients were included. ACH received 1330 patients and delivered definite care to 85% of these. Only 329 (14%) patients were major trauma of which 134 (41%) were initially received at an ACH. Nine per cent of patients were transferred between hospitals. After inter-hospital transfers, 79% of all major trauma patients received definite care at the MTC. Helicopter emergency services admitted 52% of major trauma and performed 68% of inter-hospital transfers from ACH to MTC. Forty-eight patients (2%) died within 30 days.ConclusionIn a region with a dispersed network of hospitals, geographical challenges, and low rate of major trauma cases, efforts should be made to identify patients with major trauma for treatment at a MTC as early as possible. This can be done by implementing triage and transfer guidelines, maintaining competence at ACHs for initial stabilization, and sustaining an organization for effective inter-facility transfers.© 2017 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

27 keywords...

hide…