• Ben Ockert, Volker Braunstein, Chlodwig Kirchhoff, Markus Körner, Sonja Kirchhoff, Katharina Kehr, Wolf Mutschler, and Peter Biberthaler.
• Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Ben.Ockert@med.uni-muenchen.de
• J Trauma. 2010 Dec 1; 69 (6): 1545-51.

BackgroundMonoaxial and polyaxial screw insertion are used in angular stable plating of displaced proximal humeral fractures. Aim of the study was to compare both fixation techniques by radiographic evaluation.MethodsProspective randomized treatment with monoaxial or polyaxial screw insertion in angular stable anatomic preshaped plates of displaced proximal humeral fractures. Analysis of standardized true anterior-posterior (true a.p.) and outlet-view radiographs at 1 day, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery by two radiologists with respect to radiographic evidence of secondary varus displacement, cut out of screws, osteonecrosis, and hardware failure. Secondary varus displacement was defined as a varus decrease of the humeral head-shaft angle of > 10 degree in true a.p. radiographs.ResultsSixty-six consecutive patients (48 women, [72.7%]; 18 men, [27.3%]; mean age 67.7 years [95% CI, 63.9-71.6]) with displaced proximal humeral fractures were evaluated in this study. Nineteen patients (29%) showed secondary varus displacement of > 10-degree angle. In 6 cases (9%), intra-articular cut out of screws was found. Furthermore, 1 case (2%) of nonunion was observed. No relationship between monoaxial and polyaxial screw insertion was found regarding occurrence of secondary varus displacement (monoaxial, 11/polyaxial, 8; p = 0.91) or screw cut out (monoaxial, 4/polyaxial, 2; p = 0.64). Prevalence of secondary varus displacement and hardware cut out was related to patients age (p = 0.02) and fracture pattern, according to Neer- and AO/OTA-classification (p < 0.001). The average immediate postoperative head-shaft angle was 135.2 degrees (CI, 132.3-138.1) in the group without radiographic complication, compared with 126.7-degree angle (CI, 123.6-129.7) among those with secondary varus displacement of > 10-degree angle and screw cut out (p < 0.001). Furthermore, in cases of an immediate postoperative head-shaft angle of < 130 degrees, there was a 48% incidence of secondary varus dislocation (n = 13) versus 15% in cases with a head-shaft angle > 130 degrees (n = 6, p = 0.004).ConclusionMonoaxial and polyaxial screw insertion allow for mechanical stabilization in angular stable plating of unstable proximal humerus fractures. Radiographic evidence of secondary varus displacement of > 10-degree angle and screw cut out was seen similarly often in both fixation techniques. To avoid secondary varus displacement and screw cut out, restoration of a humeral head-shaft angle of > 130 degrees seems to be important in monoaxial and polyaxial fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

22 keywords...

hide…