• Hiroharu Kamioka, Yoichi Kawamura, Kiichiro Tsutani, Masaharu Maeda, Shinya Hayasaka, Hiroyasu Okuizum, Shinpei Okada, Takuya Honda, and Yuichi Iijima.
• Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan. h1kamiok@nodai.ac.jp
• Complement Ther Med. 2013 Aug 1; 21 (4): 324-32.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a checklist of items that describes and measures the quality of reports of interventional trials assessing spa therapy.MethodsThe Delphi consensus method was used to select the number of items in the checklist. A total of eight individuals participated, including an epidemiologist, a clinical research methodologist, clinical researchers, a medical journalist, and a health fitness programmer. Participants ranked on a 9-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist.ResultsThree rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus. The final checklist contained 19 items, with items related to title, place of implementation (specificity of spa), care provider influence, and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from withdrawals, loss to follow-up, and low treatment adherence.ConclusionThis checklist is simple and quick to complete, and should help clinicians and researchers critically appraise the medical and healthcare literature, reviewers assess the quality of reports included in systematic reviews, and researchers plan interventional trials of spa therapy.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…