• Julie Halbert, Maria Crotty, Craig Whitehead, Ian Cameron, Susan Kurrle, Susan Graham, Helen Handoll, Terry Finnegan, Tim Jones, Amanda Foley, Michael Shanahan, and Hip Fracture Rehabilitation Trial Collaborative Group.
• Rehabilitation Studies Unit (Flinders University), Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Park, SA, Australia. julie.halbert@rgh.sa.gov.au
• J Rehabil Med. 2007 Sep 1; 39 (7): 507-12.

BackgroundWhile hip fractures are an important cause of disability, dependency and death in older adults, the benefit of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for people who have sustained hip fracture has not been demonstrated.MethodsSystematic review of randomized controlled trials which compare co-ordinated multi-disciplinary rehabilitation with usual orthopaedic care in older people who had sustained a hip fracture. Outcome measures included: mortality, return home, "poor outcome", total length of hospital stay, readmissions and level of function.ResultsWe identified 11 trials including 2177 patients. Patients who received multi-disciplinary rehabilitation were at a lower risk (Risk Ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96) of a "poor outcome" - that is dying or admission to a nursing home at discharge from the programme, and showed a trend towards higher levels of return home (Risk Ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15). Pooled data for mortality did not demonstrate any difference between multi-disciplinary rehabilitation and usual orthopaedic care.ConclusionThis is the first review of randomized trials to demonstrate a benefit from multi-disciplinary rehabilitation; a 16% reduction in the pooled outcome combining death or admission to a nursing home. This result supports the routine provision of organized care for patients following hip fracture, as is current practice for patients after stroke.

8 keywords...

hide…