• StridJ M CJMCDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark., A R Sauter, K Ullensvang, M N Andersen, M Daugaard, BendtsenM A FMAFDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Vennelyst Blvd. 4, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark., K Søballe, E M Pedersen, J Børglum, and T F Bendtsen.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark.
• Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1; 118 (3): 430-438.

BackgroundThe currently best-established ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB) techniques use a paravertebral location of the probe, such as the lumbar ultrasound trident (LUT). However, paravertebral ultrasound scanning can provide inadequate sonographic visibility of the lumbar plexus in some patients. The ultrasound-guided shamrock LPB technique allows real-time sonographic viewing of the lumbar plexus, various anatomical landmarks, advancement of the needle, and spread of local anaesthetic injectate in most patients. We aimed to compare block procedure outcomes, effectiveness, and safety of the shamrock vs LUT.MethodsTwenty healthy men underwent ultrasound-guided shamrock and LUT LPBs (2% lidocaine–adrenaline 20 ml, with 1 ml diluted contrast added) in a blinded randomized crossover study. The primary outcome was block procedure time. Secondary outcomes were procedural discomfort, number of needle insertions, injectate spread assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, sensorimotor effects, and lidocaine pharmacokinetics.ResultsThe shamrock LPB procedure was faster than LUT (238 [sd 74] vs 334 [156] s; P=0.009), more comfortable {numeric rating scale 0–10: 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–4] vs 4 [3–6]; P=0.03}, and required fewer needle insertions (2 [IQR 1–3] vs 6 [2–12]; P=0.003). Perineural injectate spread seen with magnetic resonance imaging was similar between the groups and consistent with motor and sensory mapping. Zero/20 (0%) and 1/19 (5%) subjects had epidural spread after shamrock and LUT (P=1.00), respectively. The lidocaine pharmacokinetics were similar between the groups.ConclusionsShamrock was faster, more comfortable, and equally effective compared with LUT.Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT02255591© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

21 keywords...

hide…