-
- Fiona Ashton, Khalid Hamid, Shazali Sulieman, William Eardley, and Paul Baker.
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, South Tees NHS Trust, UK.
- Injury. 2017 Apr 1; 48 (4): 960-965.
BackgroundPatient feedback is increasingly important to inform and develop effective healthcare within the United Kingdom. In order to optimise patient experience of ankle fracture care in our unit, we sought to identify elements of practice associated with poor patient experience and low levels of satisfaction.MethodsAdult patients with closed ankle fractures requiring fixation over a ten month period were prospectively identified. Prior to discharge all patients completed the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire (PPE-15), satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS: 0-10) and a demographic questionnaire. Operative delay and cancellation episodes were similarly noted. PPE-15 and satisfaction VAS data were collected concurrently from a control group of elective hip and knee arthroplasty patients.Results52 patients (23 males) of average age 47 years (17-86) underwent ankle fracture fixation. Median pre-operative length of stay (LOS) was 3days (IQR 1-6). Ankle fracture patients had significantly worse experiences compared to arthroplasty patients (p<0.05 across all 15 PPE domains). Once pre-operative length of stay exceeded 3days patients reported more areas of concerns (6 of 15) than those waiting 3days or less (4 of 15) (p=0.02). Cancelled patients reported significantly worse experiences, with satisfaction VAS of 7 (versus 9 in those not cancelled [p=0.005]), and median of 6 PPE-15 domains of concern (versus 3.5 [p=0.03]).ConclusionsEfforts to improve the healthcare experience of patients with ankle fractures should be focused on improving processes that minimise cancellation of surgery and the communication around delay management.Crown Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.