• JAMA · Mar 2015

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.

    Routine lorazepam premedication before surgery does not improve patient experience but does prolong time to extubation, even among anxious patients.

    pearl
    • Axel Maurice-Szamburski, Pascal Auquier, Véronique Viarre-Oreal, Philippe Cuvillon, Michel Carles, Jacques Ripart, Stéphane Honore, Thibaut Triglia, Anderson Loundou, Marc Leone, Nicolas Bruder, and PremedX Study Investigators.
    • Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital de la Timone Adulte, Marseille, France.
    • JAMA. 2015 Mar 3;313(9):916-25.

    ImportanceSedative premedication is widely administered before surgery, but little clinical evidence supports its use.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of sedative premedication on perioperative patient experience.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsA randomized clinical trial, the PremedX study, enrolled 1062 adult patients who were younger than 70 years and had been scheduled for various elective surgeries under general anesthesia at 5 French teaching hospitals (in Marseille, Montpellier, Nimes, and Nice) between January 2013 and June 2014. Neurosurgery, obstetrical, cardiac, and outpatient surgery were excluded.InterventionsPatients were randomized to 3 groups of 354 participants each to receive 2.5 mg of lorazepam, no premedication, or placebo.Main Outcomes And MeasuresThe primary outcome was perioperative patient experience assessed 24 hours after surgery with a validated questionnaire (Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie Generale; EVAN-G) describing 6 domains of satisfaction and a global index (score range, 0-100; high scores represent high satisfaction); secondary outcomes included time to extubation and early cognitive recovery. A subgroup analysis was planned a priori in patients with a high level of preoperative anxiety.ResultsPremedication with lorazepam did not improve the EVAN-G mean global index for overall level of patient satisfaction (72 [95% CI, 70-73]; n = 330) compared with no premedication (73 [95% CI, 71-74]; n = 319) or placebo (71 [95% CI, 70-73]; n = 322) (P = .38). Among patients with heightened preoperative anxiety, there were no significant differences found in the EVAN-G mean global index between the lorazepam group (68 [95% CI, 65-72]; n = 87) and the no premedication group (73 [95% CI, 69-77]; n = 57) or the placebo group (70 [95% CI, 67-72]; n = 87) (P = .18). Time to extubation was 17 minutes (95% CI, 14-20 minutes) in the lorazepam group, 12 minutes (95% CI, 11-13 minutes) for the no premedication group, and 13 minutes (95% CI, 12-14 minutes) for the placebo group (P < .001) and the rate of early cognitive recovery was 51% (95% CI, 45%-56%), 71% (95% CI, 66%-76%), and 64% (95% CI, 59%-69%), respectively (P < .001).Conclusions And RelevanceAmong patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, sedative premedication with lorazepam compared with placebo or no premedication did not improve the self-reported patient experience the day after surgery, but was associated with modestly prolonged time to extubation and a lower rate of early cognitive recovery. The findings suggest a lack of benefit with routine use of lorazepam as sedative premedication in patients undergoing general anesthesia.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01901003.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    pearl
    1

    Routine lorazepam premedication before surgery does not improve patient experience but does prolong time to extubation, even among anxious patients.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.