• Milthi Manoj, Satya PrakashM V SMVShttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-038XDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India, 605006. munaganuri1975@yahoo.co.in., Srinivasan Swaminathan, and Rithu Krishna Kamaladevi.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India, 605006.
• J Anesth. 2017 Jun 1; 31 (3): 351-357.

BackgroundThe efficacy of midazolam as premedication in children for providing pre-operative sedation and reducing parental separation anxiety has been well established. Many studies have compared the effectiveness and medication acceptance of midazolam via oral and intranasal routes. In this study, we have compared the ease of administration of oral midazolam syrup and intranasal midazolam spray as premedication, administered by parents to children.MethodsNinety children were randomly allocated into one of the two groups: group N received nasal midazolam spray 0.2 mg/kg and group O received oral midazolam syrup 0.5 mg/kg administered by the parent. The parent recorded ease of administration score and facial hedonic score. The observer recorded modified medication acceptance score. Vitals and sedation scores were assessed at specific intervals. Thirty minutes after drug administration the child was separated from the parent, and parental separation anxiety score was recorded. Mask acceptance score was recorded after application of mask upon arrival in the OT.ResultsOral midazolam syrup was found to have better ease of administration than intranasal midazolam spray as felt by the parent. Medication acceptance was better for oral midazolam. Both the groups had similar sedation scores at 15 and 30 min. Children in the oral group had a better reduction in parental separation anxiety at 30 min after drug administration and better mask acceptance than the nasal group.ConclusionOral midazolam syrup is easier for parents to administer and has better medication acceptance in children when compared to intranasal midazolam spray.

20 keywords...

hide…