• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Sep 2017

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators.

    • Tina H Pedersen, Jonas Meuli, Eike J Plazikowski, Maximilian Buttenberg, Maren Kleine-Brueggeney, Christian Seidl, Lorenz Theiler, and Robert Greif.
    • From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (THP, JM, EJP, MB, MK-B, CS, LT, RG); and Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK (MK-B).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Sep 1; 34 (9): 602-608.

    BackgroundDetecting loss of resistance (LOR) can either be taught with dedicated simulators, with a cost ranging from &OV0556;1500 to 3000, or with the 'Greengrocer's Model', requiring simply a banana.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare three dedicated epidural puncture training simulators and a banana in their ability to simulate LOR. Our hypothesis was that there was a difference between the four simulators when comparing the detection of LOR.DesignSingle-blinded, randomised, controlled study.SettingDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland.ParticipantsFifty-five consultant anaesthesiologists.InterventionsThe participants were asked to insert an epidural catheter in four different epidural puncture training simulators: Lumbar Puncture Simulator II (Kyoto Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan), Lumbar Epidural Injection Trainer (Erler-Zimmer, Lauf, Germany), Normal Adult Lumbar Puncture/Epidural Tissue (Simulab Corp., Seattle, Washington, USA) and a banana. The simulators were placed in identical boxes to blind the participants.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was the detection of LOR rated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, in which 0 mm represented 'completely unrealistic' and 100 mm represented 'indistinguishable from a real patient'.ResultsThe mean visual analogue scale scores for LOR in the four simulators were significantly different: 60 ± 25 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 55 to 65 mm], 50 ± 29 mm (95% CI, 44 to 55 mm), 64 ± 24 mm (95% CI, 58 to 69 mm) and 49 ± 32 mm (95% CI, 44 to 54 mm); P less than 0.001, Friedman test.ConclusionTwo of the three dedicated epidural simulators were rated more realistic in detecting LOR than the banana, but some participants preferred the banana to the other three simulators. Given the relative cost of a banana compared with a dedicated simulator, we suggest that a banana be used to teach the technique of LOR for epidural puncture.Trial RegistrationKEK Nr: Req-2015-z087.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.