• Karen O'Connell, Jennifer Fritzeen, Cathie E Guzzetta, Angela P Clark, Christina Lloyd, Shari H Scott, Michael D Aldridge, and Barbara Kreling.
• Karen O'Connell is associate professor of pediatrics and emergency medicine at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, and Children's National Health System, Washington, DC. Jennifer Fritzeen is program manager, Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Health System. Cathie E. Guzzetta is a nursing research consultant and a clinical professor, The George Washington University School of Nursing. Angela P. Clark is associate professor emeritus, The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, Texas. Christina Lloyd is a nursing consultant in Washington, DC. She was a neonatal intensive care unit family specialist, Children's National Health System. Shari H. Scott is a psychiatric nurse practitioner, psychiatric emergency room, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas. Michael D. Aldridge is an assistant professor of nursing, Concordia University, Austin, Texas. Barbara Kreling is a qualitative research consultant, Children's National Health System. koconnel@childrensnational.org.
• Am. J. Crit. Care. 2017 May 1; 26 (3): 229-239.

BackgroundThe paradigm is shifting from separating family members from their children during resuscitation to one of patient- and family-centered care. However, widespread acceptance is still lacking.ObjectiveTo measure attitudes, behaviors, and experiences of family members of pediatric patients during the resuscitation phase of trauma care, including family members who were present and those who were not.MethodsAn observational mixed-methods study using structured interviews and focus groups was conducted at 3 level 1 pediatric trauma centers. Family members of children who met trauma team activation criteria (N = 126; 99 present, 27 not present) were interviewed; 25 also participated in focus groups.ResultsMean attitude scores indicated a positive attitude about being present during the resuscitation phase of trauma care (3.65; SD, 0.37) or wanting to be present (3.2; SD, 0.60). Families present reported providing emotional support (94%) for their child and health care information (92%) to the medical team. Being present allowed them to advocate for their child, understand their child's condition, and provide comfort. Families in both groups felt strongly that the choice was their right but was contingent upon their bedside behavior.ConclusionsStudy findings demonstrated compelling family benefits for presence during pediatric trauma care. This study is one of the first to report on family members who were not present. The practice of family presence should be made a priority at pediatric trauma centers.©2017 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

33 keywords...

hide…