-
Intensive care medicine · Sep 2017
ReviewThe intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.
- Anders Perner, Anthony C Gordon, Derek C Angus, Francois Lamontagne, Flavia Machado, James A Russell, Jean-Francois Timsit, John C Marshall, John Myburgh, Manu Shankar-Hari, and Mervyn Singer.
- Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. anders.perner@regionh.dk.
- Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep 1; 43 (9): 1294-1305.
AbstractSeptic shock remains a global health challenge with millions of cases every year, high rates of mortality and morbidity, impaired quality of life among survivors and relatives, and high resource use both in developed and developing nations. Care and outcomes are improving through organisational initiatives and updated clinical practice guidelines based on clinical research mainly carried out by large collaborative networks. This progress is likely to continue through the collaborative work of the established and merging trials groups in many parts of the world and through refined trial methodology and translational work. In this review, international experts summarize the current position of clinical research in septic shock and propose a research agenda to advance this field.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.