• Sajjad Muhammad, Sandra Roeske, Shafqat Rasul Chaudhry, and Thomas Mehari Kinfe.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
• Neuromodulation. 2017 Oct 1; 20 (7): 661-667.

ObjectivesBurst and 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) demonstrated improvement for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with predominant, refractory back pain. Here, we report the long-term follow-up of a previously published study comparing the safety and efficacy of burst vs. 10 kHz SCS for predominant back pain (70% of global pain) of FBSS patients.MethodsThis comparative, observational study extended the follow-up period up to 20 months evaluating both SCS modalities. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VASB , VASL ]), functional capacity (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]; depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]), stimulation parameters and hardware and/or stimulation associated adverse events were recorded and analyzed over time.ResultsOverall VASB (t1,12  = 66.76, p < 0.001) and VASL (t1,12  = 4.763, p < 0.049; p < 0.001) declined over time. Burst significantly decreased VASB by 87.5% (±17.7) (mean 8 ± 0.76 to 1 ± 1.41; t1 =12.3, p < 0.001), and 10 kHz significant decreased VASB by 54.9% (±44) (mean 8 ± 0.63 to 3.5 ± 3.27; t1 =3.09, p = 0.027). No significant differences for between SCS types were revealed (t1 =1.75, p = 0.13). VASL was significantly suppressed for burst (burst: 3.6 ± 1.59 to 1.5 ± 1.06; t1  = 3.32, p = 0.013). A significant effect of time was found for functional outcome with no significant differences between SCS types (PSQI: t1,12  = 8.8, p = 0.012; and BDI: t1  = 53.3, p < 0.001). No stimulation/hardware-related complications occurred.DiscussionLong-term data of this comparative study suggests that burst responsiveness was superior to 10 kHz in our small-scale cohort, thus a larger, randomized-controlled comparative study design is highly recommended.© 2017 International Neuromodulation Society.

17 keywords...

hide…