-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Prevalence, natural history, and time-dependent outcomes of a multi-center North American cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest extracorporeal CPR candidates.
- Joshua C Reynolds, Brian E Grunau, Jonathan Elmer, Jon C Rittenberger, Kelly N Sawyer, Michael C Kurz, Ben Singer, Alastair Proudfoot, and Clifton W Callaway.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, United States. Electronic address: reyno406@msu.edu.
- Resuscitation. 2017 Aug 1; 117: 24-31.
AimEstimate prevalence of ECPR-eligible subjects in a large, North American, multi-center cohort, describe natural history with conventional resuscitation, and predict optimal timing of transition to ECPR.MethodsSecondary analysis of clinical trial enrolling adults with non-traumatic OHCA. Primary outcome was survival to discharge with favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Subjects were additionally classified as survival with unfavorable outcome (mRS 4-5), ROSC without survival (mRS 6), or without ROSC. We plotted subject accrual as a function of resuscitation duration (CPR onset to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or termination of resuscitation), and estimated time-dependent probabilities of ROSC and mRS 0-3 at discharge. Adjusted logistic regression models tested the association between resuscitation duration and survival with mRS 0-3.ResultsOf 11,368 subjects, 1237 (10.9%; 95%CI 10.3-11.5%) were eligible for ECPR, Of these, 778 (63%) achieved ROSC, 466 (38%) survived to discharge, and 377 (30%) had mRS 0-3 at discharge. Half with eventual mRS 0-3 achieved ROSC within 8.8min (95%CI 8.3-9.2min) of resuscitation, and 90% within 21.0min (95%CI 19.1-23.7min). Time-dependent probabilities of ROSC and mRS 0-3 declined over elapsed resuscitation, and the likelihood of additional cases with mRS 0-3 beyond 20min was 8.4% (95%CI 5.9-11.0%). Resuscitation duration was independently associated with survival to discharge with mRS 0-3 (OR 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.97).ConclusionApproximately 11% of subjects were eligible for ECPR. Only one-third survived to discharge with favorable outcome. Performing 9-21min of conventional resuscitation captured most ECPR-eligible subjects with eventual mRS 0-3 at hospital discharge.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.