• V Mehta, S Snidvongs, B Ghai, R Langford, and T Wodehouse.
• Pain and Anaesthesia Research Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, EC1A 7BE UK and 2Department of Anaesthesiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
• Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jun 1; 118 (6): 924-931.

Background.Quantitative sensory testing (QST) has been used to predict the outcome of epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radicular pain and has the potential to be an important tool in the selection of appropriate treatment (such as epidural steroid injections vs surgery) for patients with chronic radicular pain. In addition, QST assists in identification of the pain pathways of peripheral and central sensitization in selected groups of patients.Methods.Twenty-three patients were given dorsal root ganglion (DRG) infiltration with local anaesthesia and steroid ('DRG block'), and those who demonstrated at least 50% pain relief were offered pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) to the DRG. Questionnaires and QST scores were measured before the DRG blocks and at 1 week and 3 months after their procedure. Those who received PRF also answered questionnaires and underwent QST measurements at 1 week and 3 months after their procedure.Results.There was a significant increase in pressure pain threshold scores after DRG blocks. A reduced conditioned pain modulation response was seen before DRG, which increased after the procedure. Ten out of 23 patients underwent PRF to the DRG, and an increase in pressure pain threshold scores after PRF was observed. The conditioned pain modulation response was maintained in this group and increased after PRF.Conclusions.The study demonstrates that patients with unilateral radicular low back pain who receive dorsal root ganglion interventions show changes in pressure pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation that are consistent with a 'normalization' of peripheral and central sensitization.© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

35 keywords...

hide…