• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Apr 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Epidural neostigmine and clonidine improves the quality of combined spinal epidural analgesia in labour: A randomised, double-blind controlled trial.

    • Thomas Boogmans, Jan Vertommen, Tom Valkenborgh, Sarah Devroe, Eva Roofthooft, and Marc Van de Velde.
    • From the Department of Anesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven (TB, JV, SD, MVdV), Department of Anesthesiology, District General Hospital, Noord-Limburg, Maria Middelares Ziekenhuis, Overpelt (TV), Department of Anesthesiology, ZNA and Paola's Children's Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium (ER).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Apr 1;31(4):190-6.

    BackgroundIn labour analgesia, the combination of epidural clonidine and neostigmine as adjuvants to local anaesthetics and opioids is under investigation to provide a longer duration of initial spinal analgesia with local anaesthetics and/or opioids.ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality of analgesia with epidural neostigmine and clonidine, added to initial spinal analgesia, and to test the hypothesis that the incidence of breakthrough pain could be reduced and patient satisfaction improved.DesignRandomised double-blind controlled trial.SettingUniversity Hospital of Leuven in Belgium.ParticipantsOne hundred healthy, term (≥37 weeks) parturients.InterventionAll patients received initial spinal analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil. Fifteen minutes after spinal injection, 10 ml of a solution containing neostigmine 500 μg and clonidine 75 μg, or 10 ml physiological saline alone was injected epidurally. Patient-controlled analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil was then made available.Main Outcome MeasuresThe incidence of breakthrough pain, patient satisfaction and hourly ropivacaine use.ResultsRopivacaine use decreased significantly by 32.6% in the neostigmine/clonidine (NC) group [11.6 ± 4.2 vs. 17.2 ± 5.3 mg h in the NC group and placebo (P) group, respectively] and a significant difference in breakthrough pain was noted; only 3% in group NC had breakthrough pain compared with 36% in group P. Patient satisfaction was better after 1 h in group NC compared with group P (P <0.05) but not different after 24 h (visual analogue scale score 97 ± 5 vs. 88 ± 11 mm after 1 h; 92 ± 10 vs. 90 ± 14 mm after 24 h).ConclusionThe administration of epidural clonidine and neostigmine as adjuvants, following spinal injection of local anaesthetic, improves the quality of analgesia with less ropivacaine consumption, higher patient satisfaction 1 h after administration and a decrease in breakthrough pain compared to standard combined spinal and epidural analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.