• Puja M Shah, Lily Johnston, Bethany Sarosiek, Amy Harrigan, Charles M Friel, Robert H Thiele, and Traci L Hedrick.
• 1 Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 2 Enhanced Recovery Program, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 3 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
• Dis. Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb 1; 60 (2): 219-227.

BackgroundHospital readmission rates are an increasingly important quality metric since enactment of the 2012 Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. The proliferation of enhanced recovery protocols and earlier discharge raises concerns for increased readmission rates.ObjectiveWe evaluated the effect of enhanced recovery on readmissions and identified risk factors for readmission.DesignThis study involved implementation of a multidisciplinary enhanced recovery protocol.SettingsIt was conducted at a large academic medical center PATIENTS:: All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 2011 and 2015 at our center were included.Main Outcome MeasuresThis cohort study compared patients before and after enhanced recovery initiation, looking at 30-day readmission as the primary outcome. A multivariable logistic regression model identified predictors of 30-day readmission. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified differences in time to readmission.ResultsA total of 707 patients underwent colorectal procedures between 2011 and 2015, including 383 patients before enhanced recovery protocol was implemented and 324 patients after enhanced protocol was implemented. Length of stay decreased from a median 5 days to a median 4 days before and after enhanced recovery implementation (p < 0.0001). Thirty-day readmission decreased from 19% (72/383) in the pre-enhanced recovery pathway to 12% (38/324) in the enhanced recovery pathway (p = 0.009). Twenty-one percent (21/99) of patients who underwent ileostomy were readmitted before enhanced recovery implementation compared with 19% (18/93) of patients who underwent ileostomy after enhanced recovery implementation (p = 0.16). Multivariable logistic regression identified ileostomy as increasing the risk of readmission (p = 0.04), whereas enhanced recovery protocol decreased the risk of readmission (p = 0.006).LimitationsThe study is limited because it was conducted at a single institution and used a before-and-after study design.ConclusionsThese data suggest that use of a standardized enhanced recovery protocol significantly reduces length of stay and readmission rates in an elective colorectal surgery population. However, the presence of an ileostomy maintains a high association with readmission, serving as a significant burden to patients and providers alike. Ongoing efforts are needed to further improve the management of patients undergoing ileostomy in the outpatient setting after discharge to prevent readmissions.

37 keywords...

hide…