-
Increased Cardiac Arrest Survival and Bystander Intervention in Enclosed Pedestrian Walkway Systems.
- Minha Lee, Derya Demirtas, Jason E Buick, Michael J Feldman, Sheldon Cheskes, Laurie J Morrison, ChanTimothy C YTCYDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rescu, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: tcychan@mie.utoronto.ca., and Rescu Epistry Investigators.
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: minha.lee@mail.utoronto.ca.
- Resuscitation. 2017 Sep 1; 118: 1-7.
BackgroundCities worldwide have underground or above-ground enclosed walkway systems for pedestrian travel, representing unique environments for studying out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). The characteristics and outcomes of OHCAs that occur in such systems are unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether OHCAs occurring in enclosed pedestrian walkway systems have differing demographics, prehospital intervention, and survival outcomes compared to the encompassing city, by examining the PATH walkway system in Toronto.MethodsWe identified all atraumatic, public-location OHCAs in Toronto from April 2006 to March 2016. Exclusion criteria were obvious death, existing DNR, and EMS-witnessed OHCAs. OHCAs were classified into mutually exclusive location groups: Toronto, Downtown, and PATH-accessible. PATH-accessible OHCAs were those that occurred within the PATH system between the first basement and third floor. We analyzed demographic, prehospital intervention, and survival data using t-tests and chi-squared tests.ResultsWe identified 2172 OHCAs: 1752 Toronto, 371 Downtown, and 49 PATH-accessible. Compared to Toronto, a significantly higher proportion of PATH-accessible OHCAs was bystander-witnessed (62.6% vs 83.7%, p=0.003), had bystander CPR (56.6% vs 73.5%, p=0.019), bystander AED use (11.0% vs 42.6%, p<0.001), shockable initial rhythm (45.5% vs 72.9%, p<0.001), and overall survival (18.5% vs 33.3%, p=0.009). Similar significant differences were observed when compared to Downtown.ConclusionsThis study suggests that OHCAs in enclosed pedestrian walkway systems are uniquely different from other public settings. Bystander resuscitation efforts are significantly more frequent and survival rates are significantly higher. Urban planners in similar infrastructure systems worldwide should consider these findings when determining AED placement and public engagement strategies.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.