• Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Vegar Johansen Dagenborg, Gudrun Maria Waaler Bjørnelv, Airazat M Kazaryan, Ronny Kristiansen, Morten Wang Fagerland, John Hausken, Tor Inge Tønnessen, Andreas Abildgaard, Leonid Barkhatov, Sheraz Yaqub, Bård I Røsok, Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, Marit Helen Andersen, Kjersti Flatmark, Eline Aas, and Bjørn Edwin.
• The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
• Ann. Surg. 2018 Feb 1; 267 (2): 199-207.

ObjectiveTo perform the first randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic and open liver resection.Summary Background DataLaparoscopic liver resection is increasingly used for the surgical treatment of liver tumors. However, high-level evidence to conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is superior to open liver resection is lacking.MethodsExplanatory, assessor-blinded, single center, randomized superiority trial recruiting patients from Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway from February 2012 to January 2016. A total of 280 patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic (n = 133) or open (n = 147) parenchyma-sparing liver resection. The primary outcome was postoperative complications within 30 days (Accordion grade 2 or higher). Secondary outcomes included cost-effectiveness, postoperative hospital stay, blood loss, operation time, and resection margins.ResultsThe postoperative complication rate was 19% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 31% in the open-surgery group (12 percentage points difference [95% confidence interval 1.67-21.8; P = 0.021]). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery (53 vs 96 hours, P < 0.001), whereas there were no differences in blood loss, operation time, and resection margins. Mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly from the laparoscopic group (0 patients) to the open group (1 patient). In a 4-month perspective, the costs were equal, whereas patients in the laparoscopic-surgery group gained 0.011 quality-adjusted life years compared to patients in the open-surgery group (P = 0.001).ConclusionsIn patients undergoing parenchyma-sparing liver resection for colorectal metastases, laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly less postoperative complications compared to open surgery. Laparoscopic resection was cost-effective compared to open resection with a 67% probability. The rate of free resection margins was the same in both groups. Our results support the continued implementation of laparoscopic liver resection.

46 keywords...

hide…