• Biren B Kamdar, Daniel J Kadden, Sitaram Vangala, David A Elashoff, Michael K Ong, Jennifer L Martin, and Dale M Needham.
• Biren B. Kamdar is an assistant professor, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California. Daniel J. Kadden is a medical student at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Sitaram Vangala is principal statistician, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. David A. Elashoff is a professor, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and Department of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California. Michael K. Ong is an associate professor in residence, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a staff physician, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California. Jennifer L. Martin is an associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a research scientist and psychologist, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System. Dale M. Needham is a professor, Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. bkamdar@mednet.ucla.edu.
• Am. J. Crit. Care. 2017 Jul 1; 26 (4): 329-335.

BackgroundPoor sleep and immobility are common in patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and are associated with adverse outcomes. Interventions to promote sleep and mobilization in the MICU are gaining popularity, but feasible instruments to measure their effectiveness are lacking. Actigraphy may be useful for large-scale, continuous measurement of sleep and activity, but its feasibility in MICU patients has not been rigorously evaluated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of continuous actigraphy measurement in consecutive MICU patients.MethodsWrist and ankle actigraphy data were collected for 48 hours in consenting MICU patients. Actigraphy-based measures of estimated sleep and activity were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Agreement between wrist and ankle measurements was evaluated using Cohen κ statistics (for sleep quantity) and intraclass correlation coefficients (for activity).ResultsOverall, 35 of 48 (73%) eligible patients were enrolled, including 10 requiring mechanical ventilation. Of these patients, 34 (97%) completed the 48-hour actigraphy period; 20 (57%) found the devices comfortable. Wrist devices logged a mean (SD) of 33.4 (8.8) hours of estimated sleep (72% [19%] of recording period) and 19.6 (17.2) movements per 30-second epoch. Ankle devices recorded 43.2 (4.1) hours of estimated sleep (93% [7%] of recording period) and 5.1 (6.0) movements per 30 seconds.ConclusionsUninterrupted actigraphy is feasible and generally well tolerated by MICU patients and may be considered for future large-scale studies. Wrist and ankle actigraphy measurements of sleep and activity in this setting agree poorly and cannot be used interchangeably.©2017 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

18 keywords...

hide…