-
- Romain Bourcier, Lili Détraz, Jean Michel Serfaty, Beatrice Guyomarch Delasalle, Mahmood Mirza, Imad Derraz, Frédérique Toulgoat, Olivier Naggara, Claire Toquet, and Hubert Desal.
- Department of Neuroradiology, CHU de Nantes, Hôpital René et Guillaume Laennec, Saint Herblain, France.
- J Neuroimaging. 2017 Nov 1; 27 (6): 577-582.
Background And PurposeThe susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is related to thrombus location, composition, and size in acute stroke. No previous study has determined its inter-MRI scanner variability. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy in-vitro of four different MRI scanners for the characterization of histologic thrombus composition.MethodsThirty-five manufactured thrombi analogs of different composition that were histologically categorized as fibrin-dominant, mixed, or red blood cell (RBC)-dominant were scanned on four different MRI units with T2* sequence. Nine radiologists, blinded to thrombus composition and MRI scanner model, classified twice, in a 2-week interval, the SVS of each thrombus as absent, questionable, or present. We calculated the weighted kappa with 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the SVS on each MRI scanner to detect RBC-dominant thrombi.ResultsThe SVS was present in 42%, absent in 33%, and questionable in 25% of thrombi. The interscanner agreement was moderate to good, ranging from .45 (CI: .37-.52) to .67 (CI: .61-.74). The correlation between the SVS and the thrombus composition was moderate (κ: .50 [CI: .44-.55]) to good κ: .76 ([CI: .72-.80]). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to identify RBC-dominant clots were significantly different between MRI scanners (P < .001).ConclusionThe diagnostic accuracy of SVS to determine thrombus composition varies significantly among MRI scanners. Normalization of T2*sequences between scanners may be needed to better predict thrombus composition in multicenter studies.Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.