-
Comparative Study
[Pulmonary gas exchange in conventional ventilation and high frequency ventilation in severe respiratory insufficiency].
- W Poller, A Machraoui, and W T Ulmer.
- Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Klinikum Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum.
- Pneumologie. 1990 Feb 1; 44 Suppl 1: 668-9.
AbstractDuring high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) adequate alveolar ventilation may be achieved with lower (-35%, p less than 0.0005) central airway pressures than during conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Due to increasing ventilation-perfusion inequalities, however, intrapulmonary shunt is then considerably increased (+52%, p less than 0.0005). In disease states with extensive shunting (e.g. ARDS) both ventilation modes can provide sufficient oxygenation only if high PEEP is applied.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.