-
- Holly S Gilmer, Mengqiao Xi, and Sonja H Young.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan. Electronic address: holly.gilmer@beaumont.edu.
- World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov 1; 107: 285-290.
BackgroundThere is currently inadequate evidence on the efficacy of surgical decompression for Chiari malformation type I (CM1) in different age groups of patients. In this study, we compared postoperative outcomes across 3 different age groups using the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS).MethodsA total of 144 patients who underwent Chiari decompression at our institution between 2008 and 2014 were divided into 3 groups: group A, children age 0-18 years; group B, younger adults age 19-40 years; and group C, older adults, age 41+ years. Patient outcomes were assigned a numerical value based on the CCOS and subjected to statistical analysis. Direct comparisons were made across the 3 age groups.ResultsThe mean overall score was 14.0 over a mean follow-up of 27.2 months. All 3 groups demonstrated clinical improvement following Chiari decompression; however, group A demonstrated significantly better postoperative improvements than groups B and C in total CCOS scores (7.8% and 12.2%, respectively; P < 0.001) and all the component scores except complications. Group B was not significantly different from group C in total score or any of the component scores. There was a logarithmic relationship between age and outcome (R2 = 0.64), in which the outcome scores experienced an initial decline with increasing age but leveled off by early adulthood.ConclusionsA direct comparison among the age groups revealed a negative age effect on surgical decompression outcomes in CM1 patients. Children performed significantly better than younger and older adults. This finding supports early surgical intervention for symptomatic pediatric patients to achieve long-term surgical benefit.Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.