• Juan B Figueroa-Casas and Ricardo Montoya.
• Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Paul L Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 4800 Alberta Ave, Suite 136, El Paso, TX 79905, USA. Electronic address: Juan.Figueroa@ttuhsc.edu.
• J Crit Care. 2017 Dec 1; 42: 264-267.

PurposeFlow dyssynchrony is common during volume control ventilation but minimized during pressure control. Characterizing inspiratory flow during pressure control breaths can inform adjustments of the fixed flow of volume control to address flow dyssynchrony. This study compared inspiratory flow peak and pattern between volume control and adaptive pressure control breaths.Material And MethodsSubjects with or at risk for ARDS were ventilated with volume control decreasing ramp flow at different tidal volumes and subsequently with adaptive pressure control targeting those same tidal volumes. Inspiratory flows of volume control breaths exhibiting flow dyssynchrony, and those of pressure control breaths at the same set tidal volumes without flow dyssynchrony were analyzed, for a total of 17 subject-tidal volume conditions. Peak flow and flows at 10, 25, 50 and 75% of inspiratory time were compared between modes.ResultsGroup peak flows were not different between modes, but at 50 and 75% of inspiratory time flows were higher during adaptive pressure control. In 8 subject-tidal volume conditions VT were higher (>1ml/kg PBW) on adaptive pressure control than on volume control.ConclusionsIn patients with flow dyssynchrony during volume control ventilation, adjustment of inspiratory flow pattern should be considered to minimize this dyssynchrony.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…