• J Palliat Med · Mar 2018

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of Methods To Identify Advance Care Planning in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation.

    • Amanda Renee Stephens, Renda Soylemez Wiener, and Michael H Ieong.
    • 1 The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
    • J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar 1; 21 (3): 284-289.

    BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Yet, ACP documentation is often inaccessible at the time of impending respiratory failure, which may lead to unwanted and costly medical intensive care unit admissions. Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain directive fields and the ability to search for keywords and phrases, but these strategies to rapidly identify ACP have not been validated.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to identify the percentage of patients with severe COPD exacerbation who have outpatient ACP documentation and validate two EMR-based methods of rapidly identifying ACP documentation.DesignRetrospective cohort analysis.Setting/SubjectsPatients who required medical intensive care unit admission for exacerbation of COPD at an urban safety-net hospital between 2009 and 2014 were observed.MeasurementsWe analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of two methods to rapidly identify outpatient ACP documentation: (1) documentation in the EMR directive field and (2) text string search of notes for key phrases, compared with a gold standard clinician review.ResultsOur cohort (n = 311) was racially diverse and severely ill with obstructive lung disease. One hundred thirty-two patients (43%) had ACP documentation by gold standard chart review. Compared with a gold standard chart review, a parsimonious text string search was both sensitive (95%) and specific (97%), while the directive box was specific (100%), but not sensitive (54%), for identifying outpatient ACP documentation.ConclusionsEMR directive fields may substantially underestimate ACP when used alone. As full clinician chart reviews are impractical in the emergent setting, text string searches may be a useful strategy to rapidly identify ACP discussions for clinical care and research.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…