• Spine · Apr 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Effects of Applying a Force to C5 by a Mechanically Assisted Instrument (MAI) on Referred Pain to the Shoulder.

    • George M Hardas and Murrell George A C GAC.
    • Orthopedic Research Institute, St. George Hospital Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
    • Spine. 2018 Apr 1; 43 (7): 461-466.

    Study DesignRandomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.ObjectiveTo determine the effects of applying a force to C5 of the spine by a mechanically assisted instrument (MAI) in patients with referred shoulder pain.Summary Of Background DataManipulating C5 of the spine is a chiropractic treatment for referred shoulder pain; there are no clinical trials evaluating its efficacy. Outcome measures were patient ranked questionnaires and independent examiner findings. One hundred and twenty-five patients were diagnosed with referred shoulder pain of cervical origin; 65 patients were in the treatment cohort and 60 patients in the placebo cohort.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the effects of applying a force to C5 by a MAI to patients with referred shoulder pain. The treatment cohort had the MAI set at the maximum setting to transmit a force into the spine; the placebo cohort had the MAI turned off. Primary outcome measures were frequency and severity of extreme shoulder pain obtained via a patient-reported questionnaire; secondary outcome measures were patient ranked pain and functional outcomes as well as examiner assessed range of motion and strength. Assessment procedures were completed at 24 weeks posttreatment and data were analyzed with intent-to-treat protocol.ResultsThere was a reduction in the frequency but not severity of extreme shoulder pain in the treatment cohort, average ranking reducing from weekly to monthly (P < 0.05). Patients treated with the MAI had 10 N (P = 0.04) better internal rotation strength after 6 months posttreatment. No differences with any other outcome measures between the two cohorts at the 24-week study period.ConclusionThe major effect of applying a MAI to the level of C5 of the spine in referred shoulder pain is improved shoulder strength for internal rotation in this randomized double-blinded clinical trial.Level Of Evidence2.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…