• M Agerskov, M B Hansen, A M Nielsen, T P Møller, M Wissenberg, and L S Rasmussen.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Nov 1; 61 (10): 1345-1353.

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate the effect of automated external defibrillator (AED) feedback mechanisms on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. In addition, we investigated converting rates in patients with shockable rhythms according to AED shock waveforms and energy levels.MethodsWe collected data on OHCA occurring between 2011 and 2014 in the Capital Region of Denmark where an AED was applied prior to ambulance arrival. Patient data were obtained from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and medical records. AED data were retrieved from the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) and information on feedback mechanisms, energy waveform and energy level was downloaded from the applied AEDs.ResultsA total of 196 OHCAs had an AED applied prior to ambulance arrival; 62 of these (32%) provided audio visual (AV) feedback while no feedback was provided in 134 (68%). We found no difference in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital arrival according to AV-feedback; 34 (55%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [13-67]) vs. 72 (54%, 95% CI [45-62]), P = 1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% CI [0.6-1.9]) or 30-day survival; 24 (39%, 95% CI [28-51]) vs. 53 (40%, 95% CI [32-49]), P = 0.88 (OR 1.1 (95% CI [0.6-2.0])). Moreover, we found no difference in converting rates among patients with initial shockable rhythm receiving one or more shocks according to AED energy waveform and energy level.ConclusionsNo difference in survival after OHCA according to AED feedback mechanisms, nor any difference in converting rates according to AED waveform or energy levels was detected.© 2017 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

11 keywords...

hide…