• Burns · Mar 2018

    Raising suspicion of mistreatment from burns: Derivation and validation of the BuRN-Tool.

    • Alison M Kemp, Linda Hollén, Alan M Emond, Diane Nuttall, David Rea, and Sabine Maguire.
    • School of Medicine, Cardiff University, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kempam@cardiff.ac.uk.
    • Burns. 2018 Mar 1; 44 (2): 335-343.

    Background10-25% of childhood burns arise from maltreatment.AimTo derive and validate a clinical prediction tool to assist the recognition of suspected maltreatment.MethodsProspectively collected data from 1327 children with burns were analyzed using logistic regression. Regression coefficients for variables associated with 'referral for child maltreatment investigation' (112 cases) in multivariable analyses were converted to integers to derive the BuRN-Tool, scoring each child on a continuous scale. A cut-off score for referral was established from receiver operating curve analysis and optimal sensitivity and specificity values. We validated the BuRN-Tool on 787 prospectively collected novel cases.ResultsVariables associated with referral were: age <5years, known to social care, concerning explanation, full thickness burn, uncommon body location, bilateral pattern and supervision concern. We established 3 as cut-off score, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity for scalds of 87.5% (95% CI:61.7-98.4) and 81.5% (95% CI:77.1-85.4) respectively and for non-scalds sensitivity was 82.4% (95%CI:65.5-93.2) and specificity 78.7% (95% CI:73.9-82.9) when applied to validation data. Area under the curve was 0.87 (95% CI:0.83-0.90) for scalds and 0.85 (95% CI:0.81-0.88) for non-scalds.ConclusionThe BuRN-Tool is a potential adjunct to clinical decision-making, predicting which children warrant investigation for child maltreatment. The score is simple and easy to complete in an emergency department setting.Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.