• Bodil Karoline Ravn Munkvold, Hans Kristian Bø, Asgeir Store Jakola, Ingerid Reinertsen, Erik Magnus Berntsen, Geirmund Unsgård, Sverre Helge Torp, and Ole Solheim.
• Department of Neuroscience, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
• Neurosurgery. 2018 Aug 1; 83 (2): 288-296.

BackgroundImage guidance based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or ultrasound (US) is widely used to aid decision making in glioma surgery, but tumor delineation based on these 2 modalities does not always correspond.ObjectiveTo analyze volumes of diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGGs) based on preoperative 3-D FLAIR MRIs compared to intraoperative 3-D US image recordings to quantitatively assess potential discrepancies between the 2 imaging modalities.MethodsTwenty-three patients with supratentorial WHO grade II gliomas undergoing primary surgery guided by neuronavigation based on preoperative FLAIR MRI and navigated 3-D US were included. Manual volume segmentation was performed twice in 3-D Slicer version 4.0.0 to assess intrarater variabilities and compare modalities with regard to tumor volume. Factors possibly related to correspondence between MRI and US were also explored.ResultsIn 20 out of 23 patients (87%), the LGG tumor volume segmented from intraoperative US data was smaller than the tumor volume segmented from the preoperative 3-D FLAIR MRI. The median difference between MRI and US volumes was 7.4 mL (range: -4.9-58.7 mL, P < .001) with US LGG volumes corresponding to a median of 74% (range: 42%-183%) of the MRI LGG volumes. However, there was considerable intraobserver variability for US volumes. The correspondence between MRI and US data was higher for astrocytomas (92%).ConclusionThe tumor volumes of LGGs segmented from intraoperative US images were most often smaller than the tumor volumes segmented from preoperative MRIs. There was a much better match between the 2 modalities in astrocytomas.

22 keywords...

hide…