• Ann. Intern. Med. · Sep 2017

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial.

    • Roy W Beck, Tonya D Riddlesworth, Katrina Ruedy, Andrew Ahmann, Stacie Haller, Davida Kruger, Janet B McGill, William Polonsky, David Price, Stephen Aronoff, Ronnie Aronson, Elena Toschi, Craig Kollman, Richard Bergenstal, and DIAMOND Study Group.
    • From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Institute and Dexcom, San Diego, California; Research Institute of Dallas, Dallas, Texas; LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center, St. Louis Park, Minnesota.
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2017 Sep 19; 167 (6): 365-374.

    BackgroundContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which studies have shown is beneficial for adults with type 1 diabetes, has not been well-evaluated in those with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin.ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily injections of insulin.DesignRandomized clinical trial. (The protocol also included a type 1 diabetes cohort in a parallel trial and subsequent second trial.) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02282397).Setting25 endocrinology practices in North America.Patients158 adults who had had type 2 diabetes for a median of 17 years (interquartile range, 11 to 23 years). Participants were aged 35 to 79 years (mean, 60 years [SD, 10]), were receiving multiple daily injections of insulin, and had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of 7.5% to 9.9% (mean, 8.5%).InterventionRandom assignment to CGM (n = 79) or usual care (control group, n = 79).MeasurementsThe primary outcome was HbA1c reduction at 24 weeks.ResultsMean HbA1c levels decreased to 7.7% in the CGM group and 8.0% in the control group at 24 weeks (adjusted difference in mean change, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.5% to 0.0%]; P = 0.022). The groups did not differ meaningfully in CGM-measured hypoglycemia or quality-of-life outcomes. The CGM group averaged 6.7 days (SD, 0.9) of CGM use per week.Limitation6-month follow-up.ConclusionA high percentage of adults who received multiple daily insulin injections for type 2 diabetes used CGM on a daily or near-daily basis for 24 weeks and had improved glycemic control. Because few insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes currently use CGM, these results support an additional management method that may benefit these patients.Primary Funding SourceDexcom.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…