• Folasade Imeokparia, Morgan Johnson, Rajan K Thakkar, Sheila Giles, Teresa Capello, and Renata Fabia.
• Burn Program, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, United States. Electronic address: Folasade.Imeokparia@osumc.edu.
• Burns. 2018 Mar 1; 44 (2): 344-349.

IntroductionBurn injuries are a significant cause of morbidity. Early enteral nutrition has been shown to improve outcomes, however enteral nutrition is often held for procedures receiving general anesthesia. Limited data is available on uninterrupted perioperative nutrition in pediatric burn patients.MethodsA single, American Burn Association verified burn center database was queried for patients ≤18 years of age with ≥15% total body surface area (TBSA) burn injuries who underwent surgeries with general anesthesia. Demographic and clinical details were analyzed comparing patients who were fed continuously and those with interrupted feeds.ResultsThirty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Eighteen had continuous feeds and thirteen had interrupted feeds. We found perioperative enteral feeds safe as there were no aspiration events in these patients. Patients with interrupted feeds lost an average of 119.1kcal/kg and 1.4days of estimated energy needs. This was a 125% fall below metabolic needs. This loss was more pronounced with multiple operations and for patients <30kg. Patients with continuous feeds gained an average of 144.4kcal/kg and 1.7days of estimated energy needs. These patients surpassed metabolic needs by 173%. Again, this had the biggest impact in patients with multiple operations and those <30kg.ConclusionsThe metabolic demands of burn patients are above most critically ill patients. To meet these demands, we implemented uninterrupted perioperative feeding. There were no aspiration events. Continuous feeds were an effective means to achieve caloric demands and moderate catabolic injury. We demonstrated safety and efficacy of uninterrupted perioperative feeding of pediatric burn patients.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…