• Samantha Latremouille, Ali Al-Jabri, Philippe Lamer, Lara Kanbar, Wissam Shalish, Robert E Kearney, and Guilherme M Sant'Anna.
• Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada. At the time of this study.
• Respir Care. 2018 Jan 1; 63 (1): 62-69.

IntroductionThere is a paucity of studies comparing the physiological effects of nasal CPAP or non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation (ns-NIV) during the postextubation phase in preterm infants. Heart rate variability (HRV) can identify system instability before clinical or laboratory signs of deterioration. Thus, we sought to investigate any differences in HRV between those modes.Methods15 preterm infants with birthweight ≤1,250 g and undergoing their first extubation attempt were studied immediately after disconnection from mechanical ventilation. Electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were obtained while on nasal CPAP and ns-NIV in a random order (30-60 min on each). Time and frequency domain analyses were used to calculate HRV from 5-min segments of ECG.Results12 of 15 infants were analyzed (3 were excluded for low ECG quality): 7 successes and 5 failures. HRV parameters were higher during ns-NIV when compared to nasal CPAP, but differences were not statistically different. However, absolute and relative differences in HRV values (all time domain parameters) were significantly higher in infants who failed extubation during ns-NIV.ConclusionsNasal CPAP or ns-NIV provided immediately postextubation did not affect HRV. Interestingly, in an exploratory analysis, changes in HRV did occur during ns-NIV in the subgroup of infants who failed extubation. Hence, changes in HRV as early as 2 h after extubation should be further explored in larger studies as a potential predictor of postextubation respiratory failure.Copyright © 2018 by Daedalus Enterprises.

30 keywords...

hide…