• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Feb 2018

    Superior biomechanical properties and tying time with the modified Prusik knot and Wittstein suture loop to the Krackow stitch.

    • Chih-Kai Hong, Cheng-Li Lin, Jui-Ming Yang, Chien-An Shih, Yi-Chuan Chou, Ming-Long Yeh, Chen-Hao Chiang, and Wei-Ren Su.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Feb 1; 138 (2): 237-244.

    IntroductionThe purposes of the study were to compare (1) the biomechanical properties of the modified Prusik knot, Wittstein suture loop, and Krackow stitch fixation, and (2) the knot tying times for tendon graft fixation among the Krackow stitch, modified rolling hitch, modified Prusik knot, and Wittstein suture loop.Materials And MethodsFirst, 33 fresh-frozen porcine flexor profundus tendons were randomly divided into three groups of 11 specimens. The experimental procedure was designed to assess elongation of the suture-tendon construct across the modified Prusik knot, Wittstein suture loop, and the Krackow stitch. Multistranded nonabsorbable sutures were used. Each specimen was pre-tensioned to 100 N for three cycles, cyclically loaded to 200 N for 200 cycles, and finally loaded to failure. Elongation, load to failure, and failure mode of each specimen were recorded. Second, the knot tying times for modified rolling hitch, modified Prusik knot, Wittstein suture loop, and Krackow stitch were investigated. The measurements were taken on three different occasions to account for intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility.ResultsThe elongation after cyclic loading of the modified Prusik knot (22 ± 6%), Wittstein suture loop (25 ± 2%) were significantly smaller than the Krackow stitch (31 ± 5%) (p = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). The failure loads of three groups were not significantly from one another. Meanwhile, the Krackow stitch group (80.9 ± 16.7 s) had significantly longer average procedure time than the modified rolling hitch group (9.2. ± 1.9 s) (p < 0.001), modified Prusik knot group (9.1 ± 1.8 s) (p < 0.001), and Wittstein suture loop group (9.0 ± 2.2 s) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared to the Krackow stitch, the modified Prusik knot and Wittstein suture loop had less elongation after cyclic loading and similar ultimate load to failure in this porcine in vitro biomechanical study. Shorter knot tying times were required to complete the modified rolling hitch, modified Prusik knot, and Wittstein suture loop than the Krackow stitch.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…