• Crit Care Resusc · Oct 2017

    Review

    To be or not to be on ECMO: can survival prediction models solve the question?

    • Sacha Rozencwajg, John Fraser, Santiago Montero, Alain Combes, and Matthieu Schmidt.
    • Medical Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpetrière, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. matthieu.schmidt@aphp.fr.
    • Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Oct 1; 19 (Suppl 1): 21-28.

    AbstractOver the past decade, there has been growing interest in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a rescue therapy for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cardiogenic shock. Although survival of ECMO-treated patients has improved recently, the incidence of ECMO-related complications such as bleeding and nosocomial infections remains unacceptably high. In addition, patients often experience long-term physiological and psychological sequelae. Hence, identifying patients who will most likely benefit from ECMO is crucial. Because the technique exposes patients to complications and is associated with high costs and resource utilisation, prediction models have been developed to assist clinicians in identifying patients that would most likely survive after ECMO treatment. In addition, these prediction models enable comparison of risk-adjusted outcomes, both over time and between centres. Our review explores the latest predictive survival models developed for ECMO-treated severe cardiogenic shock and ARDS patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…