-
Review Multicenter Study
Intraoperative monitoring of the integrity of the anterior visual pathways: a methodological review and meta-analysis.
- Hussam Metwali, Katja Kniese, and Rudolf Fahlbusch.
- International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: drhussamm@yahoo.com.
- World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb 1; 110: 217-225.
BackgroundDiverse methods have been developed for intraoperative monitoring of the integrity of the visual pathways. We performed a review of the literature to determine the methodology of each technique as well as their recent development. The predictive power of each eligible technique was determined based on a meta-analysis.MethodsA literature review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Techniques adopted for intraoperative monitoring of the integrity of the visual pathways were extracted and described. The power of each eligible technique to predict the visual outcome was tested.ResultsVisual evoked potentials showed marked methodologic improvement in recent studies. Predictive power for visual deterioration after surgery was approximately 60% and reached 100% when coupled with simultaneous monitoring of electroretinography. The sensitivity of visual evoked potentials for detection of deterioration was 47.2%. The decrease of fractional anisotropy of the optic chiasma showed significant correlation with improvement of vision after chiasma compression and showed 100% predictive power for improvement.ConclusionEach technique had limitations. Visual evoked potentials had a high predictive power for detection of deterioration but with low sensitivity. Fractional anisotropy of the optic chiasma had high predictive power for improvement of vision with low predictive power for deterioration.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.