• Pain physician · Nov 2017

    Observational Study

    Loss of Efficacy to Spinal Cord Stimulator Therapy: Clinical Evidence and Possible Causes.

    • Christopher M Aiudi, Roger Y Dunn, Sara M Burns, Sarah A Roth, Arissa Opalacz, Yi Zhang, Lucy Chen, Jianren Mao, and Shihab U Ahmed.
    • Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
    • Pain Physician. 2017 Nov 1; 20 (7): E1073-E1080.

    BackgroundAlthough spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy has been shown to be efficacious in various pain conditions, the ability for SCS therapy to maintain long-term efficacy has been questioned.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether a loss of efficacy (LOE) phenomenon exists with SCS therapy and to investigate if this phenomenon is more apparent in any specific patient population.Study DesignA retrospective, observation chart review was conducted to evaluate the patient response to SCS therapy over time.SettingMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.MethodsPatients who received a SCS at the Massachusetts General Hospital, between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012, were invited to participate. A total of 62 patients were included in this study. Various models were created to analyze pain score changes over time using 2-tailed statistical analysis. Additionally, one-way ANOVA and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to determine if certain patient characteristics were associated with LOE.ResultsCompared to the visual analog scale (VAS) score at one month after device implantation, pain scores increased 1.95 points after 2 years (95% CI: 1.06 to 2.84, P = < 0.001). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups of patients who did and did not lose efficacy of their therapy. However, those who experienced LOE had a baseline SCS therapy VAS score 3.09 points lower than those who did not (95% CI: 1.69 to 4.48, P = < 0.001).LimitationsThis study had several limitations including the retrospective nature of its design, confounders to VAS scores, small sample size, missing data points, and the evaluation of only conventional, low-frequency SCS therapy.ConclusionsPatients who received a SCS had a significant increase in VAS scores over time. Our data did not show any baseline patient characteristic that helped predict LOE. However, patients who have significant baseline response to therapy may be more likely to experience LOE.Key WordsSpinal cord stimulation, chronic pain, retrospective study, low frequency electrical stimulation, efficacy, chronic pain therapy.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…