• T Steffen, D Marchesi, and M Aebi.
• Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
• Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2000 Feb 1 (371): 28-37.

AbstractPosterolateral and anterior interbody spinal arthrodesis is a frequent procedure, but high nonunion rates are reported and harvesting autologous bone graft from the iliac crest significantly increases morbidity. Bone graft substitutes are an alternative, but to date clinical results are not conclusive. Bone substitutes can be organic or inorganic, biologic or synthetic. They can have osteoconductive properties, inductive properties or both. Animal experiments are essential to investigating bone substitutes using biomechanical and histologic methods not available in clinical studies. Few authors reported on instrumented anterior fusion models, but none used the sheep model. In the current study posterolateral and anterior interbody fusion models in sheep are described. Both models used instrumented fusions, applying porous mineral scaffolds, alone or mixed with bone. The surgical techniques are described step-by-step and potential difficulties are highlighted. Preliminary results are reported for the posterolateral fusion model using coralline graft substitutes. The coral granules mixed with locally harvested bone had fusion outcomes similar to pure autologous bone. The graft substitute showed marked resorption between 12 and 20 weeks. All fusions had bone cortex and good trabecular connectivity. Histologic evaluation suggests after 20 weeks nearly the entire surface of the substitute is covered with new bone. Porous mineral bone substitutes mixed with locally harvested autologous bone are thought to be a valid alternative for posterolateral fusions.

18 keywords...

hide…