• Efthymios D Avgerinos and Rabih A Chaer.
• Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
• J. Vasc. Surg. 2015 Feb 1; 61 (2): 559-65.

AbstractAcute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. Systemic anticoagulation is the standard of care, and treatment can be escalated in the setting of massive or submassive PE, given the high mortality risk. A secondary consideration for intervention is the prevention of late-onset chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Treatment options include systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed interventions, and surgical thromboembolectomy. Whereas systemic thrombolysis seems to be beneficial in the setting of massive PE, it appears to be associated with a higher rate of major complications compared with catheter-directed thrombolysis as shown in recent randomized trials for submassive PE. The hemodynamic and clinical outcomes continue to be defined to determine the indications for and benefits of intervention. The current review summarizes contemporary evidence on the role and outcomes of catheter-directed therapies in the treatment of acute massive and submassive PE.Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…