• Andreas Fottner, Carolin V Peter, Florian Schmidutz, Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek, Christian Schröder, Farhad Mazoochian, and Volkmar Jansson.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Campus Grosshadern, Germany. andreas.fottner@med.uni-muenchen.de
• Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Oct 1; 26 (8): 830-5.

BackgroundCementless hip prostheses with different offsets are frequently used to restore the rotation center of the hip. However, a rising offset is theoretically associated with a potential risk for increased interface stresses and early loosening.MethodsTo assess this potential risk for cementless stems, the primary stability of the CLS Spotorno stem was examined with respect to three different femoral neck versions (125°, 135° and 145°) measuring 3-dimensional micromotions. For this purpose 18 stems were implanted in composite femurs and tested dynamically using physiological loading conditions considering the necessary adaptation according to the different offsets. Additionally the deformations at the surface of the composite femur were recorded to draw conclusions about the tendency for stress shielding.FindingsThe micromotions of the different offset versions were not significantly different. The highest values were obtained at the tip of the stems, even exceeding the critical limit for osseous integration of 150μm. Compared to untreated composite femurs the alteration of the deformations at the surface remained relatively low. A significant difference was only observed in the ventral measurement points.InterpretationAccording to the measured micromotions no offset version of the CLS Spotorno can be declared as superior. The assumption that the varus version is characterized by extended interface stresses could not be confirmed. Furthermore, it could be demonstrated that according to the principle of proximal load transfer of the CLS Spotorno stem an osseous integration of the distal part cannot be expected and that the risk for stress shielding appears to be relatively low.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…