• Rafael Golpe, Pilar Sanjuán López, Esteban Cano Jiménez, Olalla Castro Añón, and Luis A Pérez de Llano.
• Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España. Electronic address: rafael.golpe.gomez@sergas.es.
• Arch. Bronconeumol. 2014 Aug 1; 50 (8): 318-24.

IntroductionExposure to biomass smoke is a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unknown whether COPD caused by biomass smoke has different characteristics to COPD caused by tobacco smoke.ObjectiveTo determine clinical differences between these two types of the disease.MethodsRetrospective observational study of 499 patients with a diagnosis of COPD due to biomass or tobacco smoke. The clinical variables of both groups were compared.ResultsThere were 122 subjects (24.4%) in the biomass smoke group and 377 (75.5%) in the tobacco smoke group. In the tobacco group, the percentage of males was higher (91.2% vs 41.8%, P<.0001) and the age was lower (70.6 vs 76.2 years, P<.0001). Body mass index and FEV1% values were higher in the biomass group (29.4±5.7 vs 28.0±5.1, P=.01, and 55.6±15.6 vs 47.1±17.1, P<.0001, respectively). The mixed COPD-asthma phenotype was more common in the biomass group (21.3% vs 5%, P<.0001), although this difference disappeared when corrected for gender. The emphysema phenotype was more common in the tobacco group (45.9% vs 31.9%, P=.009). The prevalence of the chronic bronchitis and exacerbator phenotypes, the comorbidity burden and the rate of hospital admissions were the same in both groups.ConclusionDifferences were observed between COPD caused by biomass and COPD caused by tobacco smoke, although these may be attributed in part to uneven gender distribution between the groups.Copyright © 2013 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

42 keywords...

hide…