• Vinciya Pandian, Christina R Miller, Marek A Mirski, Adam J Schiavi, Athir H Morad, Ravi S Vaswani, Christopher L Kalmar, David J Feller-Kopman, Elliott R Haut, Lonny B Yarmus, and Nasir I Bhatti.
• Percutaneous Tracheostomy Service, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA. vpandia1@jhmi.edu
• Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct 1; 147 (4): 684-91.

ObjectiveTo examine whether the implementation of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy team decreases complications, improves efficiency in patient care, and reduces length of stay and cost in patients undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy.Study DesignCase series with planned data collection.SettingUrban, academic, tertiary care medical center.Subjects And MethodsPatients who underwent a percutaneous tracheostomy in 2004 and 2008, before and after the formation of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy team, were included in the study. Data for the study were retrieved from a tracheostomy database. Measured outcomes include complications, efficiency, length of stay, and cost.ResultsComplications such as airway bleeding and physiological disturbances decreased significantly in 2008 as compared with 2004. The percentage of patients who received a tracheostomy within 2 days increased from 42.3% to 92% (2004 vs 2008), showing improvement in efficiency of care. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of infection rate, length of stay, or mortality. However, in a subanalysis, the length of stay was found to be decreased in patients whose primary diagnosis was a neurological disorder. Finally, despite the necessity of a hospital-based subsidy, the team approach yielded substantial financial benefit to the medical center.ConclusionsAirway bleeding, physiological disturbances, and efficiency of care improved after the institution of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy team approach and may have a favorable impact on health care costs.

21 keywords...

hide…