• J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. · Dec 2004

    Preoperative electrocardiographic risk assessment of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

    • Yi Gang, Katerina Hnatkova, Kaushik Mandal, Azad Ghuran, and Marek Malik.
    • Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
    • J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2004 Dec 1; 15 (12): 1379-86.

    IntroductionThis study evaluated the role of surface ECG in assessment of risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG).Methods And ResultsOne hundred fifty-one patients (126 men and 25 women; age 65 +/- 10 years) without a history of AF undergoing primary elective and isolated CABG were studied. Standard 12-lead ECGs and P wave signal-averaged ECG (PSAE) were recorded 24 hours before CABG using a MAC VU ECG recorder. In addition to routine ECG measurements, two P wave (P wave complexity ratio [pCR]; P wave morphology dispersion [PMD]) and six T wave morphology descriptors (total cosine R to T [TCRT]; T wave morphology dispersion of ascending and descending part of the T wave [aTMD and dTMD], and others), and three PSAE indices (filtered P wave duration [PD]; root mean square voltage of terminal 20 msec of averaged P wave [RMS20]; and integral of P wave [Pi]) were investigated. During a mean hospital stay of 7.3 +/- 6.2 days after CABG, 40 (26%) patients developed AF (AF group) and 111 remained AF-free (no AF group). AF patients were older (69 +/- 9 years vs 64 +/- 10 years, P = 0.005). PD (135 +/- 9 msec vs 133 +/- 12 msec, P = NS) and RMS20 (4.5 +/- 1.7 microV vs 4.0 +/- 1.6 microV, P = NS) in AF were similar to that in no AF, whereas Pi was significantly increased in AF (757 +/- 230 microVmsec vs 659 +/- 206 microVmsec, P = 0.007). Both pCR (32 +/- 11 vs 27 +/- 10) and PMD (31.5 +/- 14.0 vs 26.4 +/- 12.3) were significantly greater in AF (P = 0.012 and 0.048, respectively). TCRT (0.028 +/- 0.596 vs 0.310 +/- 0.542, P = 0.009) and dTMD (0.63 +/- 0.03 vs 0.64 +/- 0.02, P = 0.004) were significantly reduced in AF compared with no AF. Measurements of aTMD and three other T wave descriptors were similar in AF and no AF. Significant variables by univariate analysis, including advanced age (P = 0.014), impaired left ventricular function (P = 0.02), greater Pi (P = 0.012), and lower TCRT (P = 0.007) or dTMD, were entered into multiple logistic regression models. Increased Pi (P = 0.038), reduced TCRT (P = 0.040), and lower dTMD (P = 0.014) predicted AF after CABG independently. In patients <70 years, a linear combination of increased pCR and lower TCRT separated AF and no AF with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 62% (P = 0.005).ConclusionECG assessment identifies patients vulnerable to AF after CABG. Combination of ECG parameters assessed preoperatively may play an important role in predicting new-onset AF after CABG.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…