• Nam P Nguyen, Paul Vos, Howard Lee, Thomas L Borok, Ulf Karlsson, Tomas Martinez, James Welsh, Deirdre Cohen, Russell Hamilton, Nga Nguyen, Ly M Nguyen, and Vincent Vinh-Hung.
• Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724-5081, USA. NamPhong.Nguyen@yahoo.com
• Oncology. 2008 Jan 1; 75 (3-4): 186-91.

Background/AimsTo identify physician selection factors in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer and how treatment outcome is affected by Tumor Board recommendations.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 213 patients treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer in a single institution was performed. All treatments followed Tumor Board recommendations: 115 patients had chemotherapy and radiation, and 98 patients received postoperative radiation. Patient characteristics, treatment toxicity, locoregional control and survival between these two treatment groups were compared. Patient survival was compared with survival data reported in randomized studies of locally advanced head and neck cancer.ResultsThere were no differences in comorbidity factors, and T or N stages between the two groups. A statistically significant number of patients with oropharyngeal and oral cavity tumors had chemoradiation and postoperative radiation, respectively (p < 0.0001). Grade 3-4 toxicities during treatment were 48 and 87% for the postoperative radiation and chemoradiation groups, respectively (p = 0.0001). There were no differences in survival, locoregional recurrences and distant metastases between the two groups. Patient survival was comparable to survival rates reported by randomized studies of locally advanced head and neck cancer.ConclusionDisease sites remained the key determining factor for treatment selection. Multidisciplinary approaches provided optimal treatment outcome for locally advanced head and neck cancer, with overall survival in these patients being comparable to that reported in randomized clinical trials.Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

39 keywords...

hide…